medium Nested List Weight Sum
Problem Statement
You are given a nestedList. Each element of the nestedList contains either integers or other such nested lists.
The depth level is determined by how many levels of nested lists the integer is within. For example, each element of the list [1, 1, [2], [2, [3]]] represents the depth of itself.
Return the sum of all integers of the list after multiplying each integer with its depth level.
Examples
-
Example 1:
- Input:
[[2, [3, 4]], [5, 6], 7] - Expected Output:
54 - Justification: The sum is calculated as 4 (2 at depth 2) + 9 (3 at depth 3) + 12 (4 at depth 3) + 10 (5 at depth 2) + 12 (6 at depth 2) + 7 (7 at depth 1).
- Input:
-
Example 2:
- Input:
[1, [4, [6]]] - Expected Output:
27 - Justification: The sum is 1 (depth 1) + 8 (4 at depth 2) + 18 (6 at depth 3).
- Input:
-
Example 3:
- Input:
[5, [2, [3, [4]]], 1] - Expected Output:
35 - Justification: The calculation is 5 (depth 1) + 4 (2 at depth 2) + 9 (3 at depth 3) + 16 (4 at depth 4) + 1 (depth 1).
- Input:
Try it yourself
Try solving this question here:
✅ Solution Nested List Weight Sum
Problem Statement
You are given a nestedList. Each element of the nestedList contains either integers or other such nested lists.
The depth level is determined by how many levels of nested lists the integer is within. For example, each element of the list [1, 1, [2], [2, [3]]] represents the depth of itself.
Return the sum of all integers of the list after multiplying each integer with its depth level.
Examples
-
Example 1:
- Input:
[[2, [3, 4]], [5, 6], 7] - Expected Output:
54 - Justification: The sum is calculated as 4 (2 at depth 2) + 9 (3 at depth 3) + 12 (4 at depth 3) + 10 (5 at depth 2) + 12 (6 at depth 2) + 7 (7 at depth 1).
- Input:
-
Example 2:
- Input:
[1, [4, [6]]] - Expected Output:
27 - Justification: The sum is 1 (depth 1) + 8 (4 at depth 2) + 18 (6 at depth 3).
- Input:
-
Example 3:
- Input:
[5, [2, [3, [4]]], 1] - Expected Output:
35 - Justification: The calculation is 5 (depth 1) + 4 (2 at depth 2) + 9 (3 at depth 3) + 16 (4 at depth 4) + 1 (depth 1).
- Input:
Solution
To solve this problem, a recursive approach is ideal. This approach works by traversing each element in the list. If the element is an integer, we multiply it by its depth and add it to the total sum. If the element is another list, we recursively process this list, increasing the depth by one.
This method is effective because it naturally handles the nested structure of the input and ensures that each integer is multiplied by its correct depth level. The recursion elegantly simplifies the process of diving into nested lists and accumulating the weighted sum.
Step-by-Step Algorithm
- Define a method
nestedSumwhich takes a nested list and an integerdepth. - Initialize a variable
totalSumto 0. - Iterate through each element in the nested list.
- If the element is an integer, add it to
totalSummultiplied bydepth. - If the element is a list, recursively call
nestedSumwith the list anddepth + 1, and add the result tototalSum.
- If the element is an integer, add it to
- Return
totalSum.
Algorithm Walkthrough
Let's consider the input: [[2, [3, 4]], [5, 6], 7].
- Start with the outer list:
[[2, [3, 4]], [5, 6], 7]withdepth = 1. - The first element is
[2, [3, 4]]. It's a nested list, so we process its elements:2is an integer atdepth = 2. Add2 * 2 = 4tototalSum.[3, 4]is another nested list. Process its elements atdepth = 3:3is an integer. Add3 * 3 = 9tototalSum.4is an integer. Add4 * 3 = 12tototalSum.
- The second element is
[5, 6], another list atdepth = 2. Process its elements:5is an integer. Add5 * 2 = 10tototalSum.6is an integer. Add6 * 2 = 12tototalSum.
- The third element is
7, a single integer atdepth = 1. Add7 * 1 = 7tototalSum. - Summing all these, the total sum is
4 + 9 + 12 + 10 + 12 + 7 = 54.
Code
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.List;
// NestedInteger class represents either a single integer or a nested list of integers
class NestedInteger {
private Integer value;
private List<NestedInteger> list;
private boolean isSingleInteger;
// Constructor for a single integer
public NestedInteger(int value) {
this.value = value;
this.isSingleInteger = true;
}
// Constructor for an empty nested list
public NestedInteger() {
this.list = new ArrayList<>();
this.isSingleInteger = false;
}
// Returns true if this NestedInteger holds a single integer
public boolean isInteger() {
return isSingleInteger;
}
// Returns the single integer that this NestedInteger holds, if it holds a single integer
public Integer getInteger() {
return isSingleInteger ? value : null;
}
// Adds a NestedInteger to this nested list
public void add(NestedInteger ni) {
if (!isSingleInteger) {
this.list.add(ni);
}
}
// Returns the nested list that this NestedInteger holds, if it holds a nested list
public List<NestedInteger> getList() {
return isSingleInteger ? new ArrayList<>() : list;
}
}
// Solution class with a method to calculate the nested list weight sum
public class Solution {
// Calculates the sum of integers in the nested list, weighted by their depth
private int nestedSum(List<NestedInteger> nestedList, int depth) {
int totalSum = 0;
for (NestedInteger ni : nestedList) {
if (ni.isInteger()) {
// If it's a single integer, add its value multiplied by its depth
totalSum += ni.getInteger() * depth;
} else {
// If it's a nested list, recursively calculate its sum
totalSum += nestedSum(ni.getList(), depth + 1);
}
}
return totalSum;
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
Solution solution = new Solution();
// Modified Example 1: [[2, [3, 4]], [5, 6], 7]
// Creating the nested list structure
NestedInteger list1Sublist = new NestedInteger();
list1Sublist.add(new NestedInteger(3));
list1Sublist.add(new NestedInteger(4));
NestedInteger list1 = new NestedInteger();
list1.add(new NestedInteger(2));
list1.add(list1Sublist);
NestedInteger list2 = new NestedInteger();
list2.add(new NestedInteger(5));
list2.add(new NestedInteger(6));
List<NestedInteger> modExample1 = new ArrayList<>();
modExample1.add(list1);
modExample1.add(list2);
modExample1.add(new NestedInteger(7));
// Calculating and printing the sum
System.out.println("Output: " + solution.nestedSum(modExample1, 1));
}
}
Complexity Analysis
- Time Complexity:
O(N), where N is the total number of elements in the list, including nested lists. This is because each element is processed exactly once. - Space Complexity:
O(D), where D is the maximum depth of the nested lists. This is due to the recursive stack.
🤖 Don't fully get this? Learn it with Claude
Stuck on Nested List Weight Sum? Open Claude, copy a block below, and it'll teach you this exact concept — visually and interactively.
Progressively stronger hints — you still solve it.
I'm working on the problem **Nested List Weight Sum** (DSA). Give me a HINT LADDER: start with the tiniest nudge, then wait. Only reveal the next, stronger hint when I ask. Do NOT show the full solution unless I type 'show solution'. Keep me doing the thinking. If you're unsure or a claim isn't standard, say so and reason from first principles instead of guessing.
See the technique, not just code.
Explain the optimal approach to **Nested List Weight Sum** with a VISUAL walkthrough: trace it on a small concrete example using ASCII art / a step-by-step diagram, narrate what changes each step, then give time & space complexity with a one-line derivation. If you're unsure or a claim isn't standard, say so and reason from first principles instead of guessing.
Catch bugs, edge cases, sub-optimality.
I'll paste my solution to **Nested List Weight Sum**. Review it for correctness, missed edge cases, and time/space complexity, then coach me toward the optimal — don't just rewrite it. Ask me to paste my code now. If you're unsure or a claim isn't standard, say so and reason from first principles instead of guessing.
Lock in recognition with look-alikes.
Give me 2 problems that use the SAME underlying pattern as **Nested List Weight Sum**. For each, let me attempt first, then review my answer and name the trigger signal that reveals the pattern. If you're unsure or a claim isn't standard, say so and reason from first principles instead of guessing.