medium Dot Product of Two Sparse Vectors
Problem Statement
Given two sparse vectors, efficiently compute the dot product of them.
A sparse vector is one in which most elements are zero.
Implement class Solution:
Solution(nums)Initializes the object with the vector numsdotProduct(vec)Calculates the dot product between thevecand instance ofSolution.
Examples
-
Example 1:
- Input: vec1 =
[1, 0, 0, 2], vec2 =[2, 3, 0, 1] - Expected Output:
4 - Justification: The dot product is
(1*2) + (0*3) + (0*0) + (2*1) = 2 + 0 + 0 + 2 = 4.
- Input: vec1 =
-
Example 2:
- Input: vec1 =
[0, 0, 0, 0], vec2 =[1, 1, 1, 1] - Expected Output:
0 - Justification: Since
vec1is all zeros, the dot product is0regardless ofvec2's values.
- Input: vec1 =
-
Example 3:
- Input: vec1 =
[1, 0, 0, 2, 3], vec2 =[0, 3, 0, 4, 0] - Expected Output:
8 - Justification: The dot product is
(1*0) + (0*3) + (0*0) + (2*4) + (3*0) = 8.
- Input: vec1 =
Constraints:
- n == nums1.length == nums2.length
- 1 <= n <= 105
- 0 <= nums1[i], nums2[i] <= 100
Try it yourself
Try solving this question here:
✅ Solution Dot Product of Two Sparse Vectors
Problem Statement
Given two sparse vectors, efficiently compute the dot product of them.
A sparse vector is one in which most elements are zero.
Implement class Solution:
Solution(nums)Initializes the object with the vector numsdotProduct(vec)Calculates the dot product between thevecand instance ofSolution.
Examples
-
Example 1:
- Input: vec1 =
[1, 0, 0, 2], vec2 =[2, 3, 0, 1] - Expected Output:
4 - Justification: The dot product is
(1*2) + (0*3) + (0*0) + (2*1) = 2 + 0 + 0 + 2 = 4.
- Input: vec1 =
-
Example 2:
- Input: vec1 =
[0, 0, 0, 0], vec2 =[1, 1, 1, 1] - Expected Output:
0 - Justification: Since
vec1is all zeros, the dot product is0regardless ofvec2's values.
- Input: vec1 =
-
Example 3:
- Input: vec1 =
[1, 0, 0, 2, 3], vec2 =[0, 3, 0, 4, 0] - Expected Output:
8 - Justification: The dot product is
(1*0) + (0*3) + (0*0) + (2*4) + (3*0) = 8.
- Input: vec1 =
Constraints:
- n == nums1.length == nums2.length
- 1 <= n <= 105
- 0 <= nums1[i], nums2[i] <= 100
Solution
To solve this problem, we focus on the sparse nature of the vectors. A sparse vector has many zeros, which contribute nothing to the dot product. Thus, we avoid computations involving these zeros. The effective approach is to iterate through the non-zero elements of the vectors and compute their products only for corresponding indices. This is efficient because it significantly reduces the number of multiplications and additions compared to a naive approach that processes every element.
The algorithm leverages a data structure like a hash map to store the non-zero elements of one vector, indexed by their positions. We then iterate through the second vector, and for each non-zero element, we check if there's a corresponding non-zero element in the first vector (using the hash map). If so, we multiply these elements and add the result to a running total, which eventually becomes the dot product.
Step-by-step Algorithm
-
Implement the Constructor (
Solution()):- The constructor of the
Solutionclass takes an array of integers as input, representing a vector. - Inside the constructor, iterate through the input array.
- For each element, check if it is non-zero.
- If an element is non-zero, store its value and index in the data structure (such as a HashMap or Dictionary).
- The constructor of the
-
Implement the
dotProductMethod:- This method calculates the dot product of the current vector instance with another vector.
- It takes another
Solutionclass instance as input. - Initialize a variable, say
result, to 0. This will hold the result of the dot product. - Iterate through the non-zero elements of the other
Solutioninstance. - For each non-zero element in the other vector, check if the current vector has a non-zero element at the same index.
- If it does, multiply the two non-zero elements and add the product to
result. - Return
resultas the dot product of the two vectors.
Algorithm Walkthrough
Example Input:
vec1 = [1, 0, 0, 2, 3],
vec2 = [0, 3, 0, 4, 0]
- Create two
Solutionobjects,solutionVec1andsolutionVec2, by passingvec1andvec2to the constructors respectively. - Inside
Solution()forsolutionVec1, the constructor stores the non-zero elements and their indices in a data structure:{0: 1, 3: 2, 4: 3}. - Similarly, for
solutionVec2, the constructor stores:{1: 3, 3: 4}. - Call
dotProductmethod onsolutionVec1and passsolutionVec2as an argument. - The method iterates through the non-zero elements of
solutionVec2. - For each non-zero element in
solutionVec2, it checks ifsolutionVec1has a non-zero element at the same index. - It finds a match at index 3 (value 2 in
solutionVec1and value 4 insolutionVec2). So it calculates2 * 4 = 8. - There are no other matching indices with non-zero values.
- The method returns
8as the final dot product.
Code
import java.util.HashMap;
import java.util.Map;
public class Solution {
private Map<Integer, Integer> nonZeroValues;
// Constructor to initialize the non-zero values of the vector
public Solution(int[] nums) {
nonZeroValues = new HashMap<>();
for (int i = 0; i < nums.length; i++) {
if (nums[i] != 0) {
// Store only non-zero elements with their index
nonZeroValues.put(i, nums[i]);
}
}
}
// Method to compute the dot product of two sparse vectors
public int dotProduct(Solution vec) {
int result = 0;
for (Map.Entry<Integer, Integer> entry : vec.nonZeroValues.entrySet()) {
if (this.nonZeroValues.containsKey(entry.getKey())) {
// Multiply and sum only for matching non-zero indices
result += entry.getValue() * this.nonZeroValues.get(entry.getKey());
}
}
return result;
}
// Main method to test the dot product with examples
public static void main(String[] args) {
Solution vec1 = new Solution(new int[] { 1, 0, 0, 2 });
Solution vec2 = new Solution(new int[] { 2, 3, 0, 1 });
System.out.println("Example 1: " + vec1.dotProduct(vec2));
vec1 = new Solution(new int[] { 0, 0, 0, 0 });
vec2 = new Solution(new int[] { 1, 1, 1, 1 });
System.out.println("Example 2: " + vec1.dotProduct(vec2));
vec1 = new Solution(new int[] { 1, 0, 0, 2, 3 });
vec2 = new Solution(new int[] { 0, 3, 0, 4, 0 });
System.out.println("Example 3: " + vec1.dotProduct(vec2));
}
}
Complexity Analysis
Time Complexity
-
Constructor (
Solution()):O(n), wherenis the length of the input vector, as it iterates through all elements once. -
Dot Product Calculation (
dotProduct):O(k), wherekis the number of non-zero elements in the smaller of the two vectors, since lookup in the hash map is generallyO(1).
Overall Time Complexity: O(n + k), where k < n. So, overall time complexity is o(n).
Space Complexity
The space complexity of the algorithm is O(k), where k is the number of non-zero elements in the vector. This is for the hash map or dictionary storing these elements.
Another Approach by Traversing Vector
The linear approach to computing the dot product of two sparse vectors relies on a straightforward yet effective method. Unlike strategies that involve storing and manipulating only the non-zero elements of the vectors, this approach retains and utilizes the entire structure of both vectors. The core logic behind this approach is the direct multiplication of corresponding elements from both vectors. Essentially, it mimics the standard process of dot product calculation, but it is specifically tailored for sparse vectors where many elements are zero.
This method is characterized by its simplicity and directness. By iterating through both vectors in parallel, we multiply each pair of corresponding elements and accumulate their products. The effectiveness of this approach is evident in cases where the vectors are not extremely sparse, or the distribution of non-zero elements is such that they align frequently. While it might seem less efficient due to the involvement of zero elements in the computations, its linear nature and the absence of complex data structures or lookups make it quite straightforward to implement and understand. This approach is a robust solution that aligns well with conventional vector operations, ensuring clarity and maintainability in practical applications.
Step-by-Step Algorithm
-
Implement the Constructor (
Solution()):- The constructor accepts an array of integers as input.
- Store the entire input array in the class member array.
-
Implement the
dotProductMethod:- This method accepts another
Solutioninstance as input. - Initialize a variable, say
result, to 0 for accumulating the dot product. - Iterate over the elements of both vectors simultaneously.
- Multiply corresponding elements from both vectors and add the product to
result. - Return
resultas the final dot product.
- This method accepts another
Algorithm Walkthrough
- Example Input:
-
vec1 = [1, 0, 0, 2, 3] -
vec2 = [0, 3, 0, 4, 0]
- Instantiate two
Solutionobjects withvec1andvec2. - In each constructor, the entire vector is stored.
- Call
dotProducton one object, passing the other as an argument. - The method iterates over the vectors:
1*0 + 0*3 + 0*0 + 2*4 + 3*0. - The sum of these products is
0 + 0 + 0 + 8 + 0 = 8. - The method returns 8 as the dot product.
-
public class Solution {
private int[] vector;
// Constructor to store the entire vector
public Solution(int[] nums) {
vector = nums;
}
// Method to calculate the dot product
public int dotProduct(Solution vec) {
int result = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < vector.length; i++) {
result += this.vector[i] * vec.vector[i]; // Multiply corresponding elements
}
return result;
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
Solution vec1 = new Solution(new int[]{1, 0, 0, 2});
Solution vec2 = new Solution(new int[]{2, 3, 0, 1});
System.out.println("Example 1: " + vec1.dotProduct(vec2));
vec1 = new Solution(new int[]{0, 0, 0, 0});
vec2 = new Solution(new int[]{1, 1, 1, 1});
System.out.println("Example 2: " + vec1.dotProduct(vec2));
vec1 = new Solution(new int[]{1, 0, 0, 2, 3});
vec2 = new Solution(new int[]{0, 3, 0, 4, 0});
System.out.println("Example 3: " + vec1.dotProduct(vec2));
}
}
Complexity Analysis
Time Complexity
-
Constructor (
Solution()):O(n), wherenis the length of the input vector, for storing the entire vector. -
Dot Product Calculation (
dotProduct):O(n), as it linearly traverses the entire length of both vectors once.
Overall Time Complexity: O(n), dominated by the linear traversal in the dotProduct method.
Space Complexity
The space complexity of the algorithm is O(n) as we store the entire vector in the constructor.
This linear approach is less efficient for sparse vectors with many zeros but is simpler and more straightforward.
🤖 Don't fully get this? Learn it with Claude
Stuck on Dot Product of Two Sparse Vectors? Open Claude, copy a block below, and it'll teach you this exact concept — visually and interactively.
Progressively stronger hints — you still solve it.
I'm working on the problem **Dot Product of Two Sparse Vectors** (DSA). Give me a HINT LADDER: start with the tiniest nudge, then wait. Only reveal the next, stronger hint when I ask. Do NOT show the full solution unless I type 'show solution'. Keep me doing the thinking. If you're unsure or a claim isn't standard, say so and reason from first principles instead of guessing.
See the technique, not just code.
Explain the optimal approach to **Dot Product of Two Sparse Vectors** with a VISUAL walkthrough: trace it on a small concrete example using ASCII art / a step-by-step diagram, narrate what changes each step, then give time & space complexity with a one-line derivation. If you're unsure or a claim isn't standard, say so and reason from first principles instead of guessing.
Catch bugs, edge cases, sub-optimality.
I'll paste my solution to **Dot Product of Two Sparse Vectors**. Review it for correctness, missed edge cases, and time/space complexity, then coach me toward the optimal — don't just rewrite it. Ask me to paste my code now. If you're unsure or a claim isn't standard, say so and reason from first principles instead of guessing.
Lock in recognition with look-alikes.
Give me 2 problems that use the SAME underlying pattern as **Dot Product of Two Sparse Vectors**. For each, let me attempt first, then review my answer and name the trigger signal that reveals the pattern. If you're unsure or a claim isn't standard, say so and reason from first principles instead of guessing.