hard Number of Valid Subarrays
Problem Statement
Given an integer array nums, return the total count of non-empty subarrays within nums where each subarray must have its first element as the smallest among all its elements.
A subarray is a Contiguous part of an array.
Examples
-
Example 1:
- Input:
nums = [4, 3, 1] - Expected Output:
3 - Justification: The valid subarrays are
[4],[3], and[1]. Each subarray consists of a single element, satisfying the condition since there's no smaller element than the first.
- Input:
-
Example 2:
- Input:
nums = [1, 3, 2, 4, 1] - Expected Output:
10 - Justification: The valid subarrays are
[1],[1, 3],[1, 3, 2],[1, 3, 2, 4],[1, 3, 2, 4, 1],[3],[2],[2, 4],[4], and[1].
- Input:
-
Example 3:
- Input:
nums = [3, 3, 3] - Expected Output:
6 - Justification: The valid subarrays are
[3],[3],[3],[3, 3],[3, 3], and[3, 3, 3]. Since all elements are equal, all subarrays starting with any element satisfy the condition.
- Input:
Try it yourself
Try solving this question here:
✅ Solution Number of Valid Subarrays
Problem Statement
Given an integer array nums, return the total count of non-empty subarrays within nums where each subarray must have its first element as the smallest among all its elements.
A subarray is a Contiguous part of an array.
Examples
-
Example 1:
- Input:
nums = [4, 3, 1] - Expected Output:
3 - Justification: The valid subarrays are
[4],[3], and[1]. Each subarray consists of a single element, satisfying the condition since there's no smaller element than the first.
- Input:
-
Example 2:
- Input:
nums = [1, 3, 2, 4, 1] - Expected Output:
10 - Justification: The valid subarrays are
[1],[1, 3],[1, 3, 2],[1, 3, 2, 4],[1, 3, 2, 4, 1],[3],[2],[2, 4],[4], and[1].
- Input:
-
Example 3:
- Input:
nums = [3, 3, 3] - Expected Output:
6 - Justification: The valid subarrays are
[3],[3],[3],[3, 3],[3, 3], and[3, 3, 3]. Since all elements are equal, all subarrays starting with any element satisfy the condition.
- Input:
Solution
To solve this problem, we can use a stack to keep track of elements in a way that helps us quickly determine the number of valid subarrays ending with each element of the array. The crux of this approach lies in understanding that a valid subarray can be extended by elements larger than or equal to its first element without violating the condition. This makes a stack an ideal data structure for maintaining a sequence of elements where each new element can potentially form new valid subarrays with the preceding ones.
Our approach is effective because it efficiently iterates through the array once, leveraging the stack to manage the elements in a way that minimizes unnecessary comparisons. Each element is pushed onto the stack only once and popped only once, ensuring that we keep our operations to a minimum while accurately counting the valid subarrays.
Step-by-step Algorithm
-
Initialize a Stack: Start by creating an empty stack. This stack will be utilized to store the indices of elements from the input array
nums. The stack helps in tracking the elements that are in non-decreasing order from the current index being processed. -
Initialize Count Variable: Set up a variable,
count, to keep a cumulative total of valid subarrays discovered throughout the iteration of the array. Initializecountto0. -
Iterate Through the Array:
- Loop over each element in
numsusing an index variablei. For eachi, perform the following:- Maintain Stack for Non-Decreasing Order: While the stack is not empty and the element at
nums[stack.peek()]is greater thannums[i], pop elements from the stack. This ensures that the stack only contains indices of elements that are in non-decreasing order up to the current indexi. - Push Current Index onto Stack: Push the current index
ionto the stack. This action signifies thatnums[i]is now the last element of a valid subarray ending ati. - Update Count: Increment the
countby the current size of the stack. The size of the stack represents the number of valid subarrays that end at the current element.
- Maintain Stack for Non-Decreasing Order: While the stack is not empty and the element at
- Loop over each element in
-
Return the Total Count: After completing the iteration over the array, return the
countvariable. This variable now contains the total number of valid subarrays withinnums.
Algorithm Walkthrough
Let's consider the Input: nums = [1, 3, 2, 4, 1].
-
Start:
stack = [],count = 0 -
i=0 (
nums[i] = 1):- Stack is empty, so push
0. stack = [0]- Increment
countby stack size (1). count = 1
- Stack is empty, so push
-
i=1 (
nums[i] = 3):3is greater than1(nums[stack.peek()]), so push1.stack = [0, 1]- Increment
countby stack size (2). count = 3
-
i=2 (
nums[i] = 2):2is less than3(nums[stack.peek()]), pop1.stack = [0], then push2.stack = [0, 2]- Increment
countby stack size (2). count = 5
-
i=3 (
nums[i] = 4):4is greater than2(nums[stack.peek()]), so push3.stack = [0, 2, 3]- Increment
countby stack size (3). count = 8
-
i=4 (
nums[i] = 1):1is less than4(nums[stack.peek()]), pop3.1is less than2(nums[stack.peek()]), pop2.stack = [1], then push4.stack = [1, 4]- Increment
countby stack size (2). count = 10
The final count after the loop is 10.
Code
import java.util.Stack;
public class Solution {
public int validSubarrays(int[] nums) {
// Initialize a stack to store indices of elements
Stack<Integer> stack = new Stack<>();
// Initialize a variable to store the count of valid subarrays
int count = 0;
// Iterate through the array
for (int i = 0; i < nums.length; i++) {
// Remove indices from the stack where the corresponding element is greater than nums[i]
while (!stack.isEmpty() && nums[stack.peek()] > nums[i]) {
stack.pop();
}
// Push the current index onto the stack
stack.push(i);
// Increment the count by the size of the stack (number of valid subarrays ending at index i)
count += stack.size();
}
// Return the total count of valid subarrays
return count;
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
// Test cases
Solution solution = new Solution();
System.out.println(solution.validSubarrays(new int[] { 4, 3, 1 })); // Expected output: 3
System.out.println(solution.validSubarrays(new int[] { 1, 3, 2, 4, 1 })); // Expected output: 10
System.out.println(solution.validSubarrays(new int[] { 3, 3, 3 })); // Expected output: 6
}
}
Complexity Analysis
Time Complexity
The time complexity of the algorithm is nums. This efficiency is achieved because each element in the array is processed exactly once when it is pushed onto the stack and at most once when it is popped from the stack.
Space Complexity
The space complexity is
🤖 Don't fully get this? Learn it with Claude
Stuck on Number of Valid Subarrays? Open Claude, copy a block below, and it'll teach you this exact concept — visually and interactively.
Progressively stronger hints — you still solve it.
I'm working on the problem **Number of Valid Subarrays** (DSA). Give me a HINT LADDER: start with the tiniest nudge, then wait. Only reveal the next, stronger hint when I ask. Do NOT show the full solution unless I type 'show solution'. Keep me doing the thinking. If you're unsure or a claim isn't standard, say so and reason from first principles instead of guessing.
See the technique, not just code.
Explain the optimal approach to **Number of Valid Subarrays** with a VISUAL walkthrough: trace it on a small concrete example using ASCII art / a step-by-step diagram, narrate what changes each step, then give time & space complexity with a one-line derivation. If you're unsure or a claim isn't standard, say so and reason from first principles instead of guessing.
Catch bugs, edge cases, sub-optimality.
I'll paste my solution to **Number of Valid Subarrays**. Review it for correctness, missed edge cases, and time/space complexity, then coach me toward the optimal — don't just rewrite it. Ask me to paste my code now. If you're unsure or a claim isn't standard, say so and reason from first principles instead of guessing.
Lock in recognition with look-alikes.
Give me 2 problems that use the SAME underlying pattern as **Number of Valid Subarrays**. For each, let me attempt first, then review my answer and name the trigger signal that reveals the pattern. If you're unsure or a claim isn't standard, say so and reason from first principles instead of guessing.