Solution Longest Common Subsequence
Problem Statement
Given two strings 's1' and 's2', find the length of the longest subsequence which is common in both the strings.
A subsequence is a sequence that can be derived from another sequence by deleting some or no elements without changing the order of the remaining elements.
Example 1:
Input: s1 = "abdca"
s2 = "cbda"
Output: 3
Explanation: The longest common subsequence is "bda".
Example 2:
Input: s1 = "passport"
s2 = "ppsspt"
Output: 5
Explanation: The longest common subsequence is "psspt".
Constraints:
- 1 <= s1.length, s2.length <= 1000`
s1ands2consist of only lowercase English characters.
Basic Solution
A basic brute-force solution could be to try all subsequences of 's1' and 's2' to find the longest one. We can match both the strings one character at a time. So for every index 'i' in 's1' and 'j' in 's2' we must choose between:
- If the character
s1[i]matchess2[j], we can recursively match for the remaining lengths. - If the character
s1[i]does not matchs2[j], we will start two new recursive calls by skipping one character separately from each string.
Here is the code:
class Solution {
public int findLCSLength(String s1, String s2) {
return findLCSLengthRecursive(s1, s2, 0, 0);
}
private int findLCSLengthRecursive(String s1, String s2, int i1, int i2) {
if (i1 == s1.length() || i2 == s2.length()) return 0;
if (s1.charAt(i1) == s2.charAt(i2)) return (
1 + findLCSLengthRecursive(s1, s2, i1 + 1, i2 + 1)
);
int c1 = findLCSLengthRecursive(s1, s2, i1, i2 + 1);
int c2 = findLCSLengthRecursive(s1, s2, i1 + 1, i2);
return Math.max(c1, c2);
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
Solution lcs = new Solution();
System.out.println(lcs.findLCSLength("abdca", "cbda"));
System.out.println(lcs.findLCSLength("passport", "ppsspt"));
}
}
The time complexity of the above algorithm is exponential
Top-down Dynamic Programming with Memoization
We can use an array to store the already solved subproblems.
The two changing values to our recursive function are the two indexes, i1 and i2. Therefore, we can store the results of all the subproblems in a two-dimensional array. (Another alternative could be to use a hash-table whose key would be a string (i1 + "|" + i2)).
Here is the code:
class Solution {
public int findLCSLength(String s1, String s2) {
Integer[][] dp = new Integer[s1.length()][s2.length()];
return findLCSLengthRecursive(dp, s1, s2, 0, 0);
}
private int findLCSLengthRecursive(Integer[][] dp, String s1, String s2, int i1, int i2) {
if (i1 == s1.length() || i2 == s2.length())
return 0;
if (dp[i1][i2] == null) {
if (s1.charAt(i1) == s2.charAt(i2))
dp[i1][i2] = 1 + findLCSLengthRecursive(dp, s1, s2, i1 + 1, i2 + 1);
else {
int c1 = findLCSLengthRecursive(dp, s1, s2, i1, i2 + 1);
int c2 = findLCSLengthRecursive(dp, s1, s2, i1 + 1, i2);
dp[i1][i2] = Math.max(c1, c2);
}
}
return dp[i1][i2];
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
Solution lcs = new Solution();
System.out.println(lcs.findLCSLength("abdca", "cbda"));
System.out.println(lcs.findLCSLength("passport", "ppsspt"));
}
}
Bottom-up Dynamic Programming
Since we want to match all the subsequences of the given two strings, we can use a two-dimensional array to store our results. The lengths of the two strings will define the size of the array's two dimensions. So for every index 'i' in string 's1' and 'j' in string 's2', we will choose one of the following two options:
- If the character
s1[i]matchess2[j], the length of the common subsequence would be one plus the length of the common subsequence till thei-1andj-1indexes in the two respective strings. - If the character
s1[i]does not matchs2[j], we will take the longest subsequence by either skipping ith or jth character from the respective strings.
So our recursive formula would be:
if s1[i] == s2[j]
dp[i][j] = 1 + dp[i-1][j-1]
else
dp[i][j] = max(dp[i-1][j], dp[i][j-1])
Let's draw this visually for "abcda" and "cbda". Starting with a subsequence of zero lengths, if any string has zero length then the common subsequence will be of zero length:
![i:0, j:0-5 and i:0-4, j:0 => dp[i][j] = 0, as we don't have any common subsequence when one of the string is of zero length](/assets/f462c1d5ddc07d7f.webp)
![i:1, j:1 => dp[i][j] = max(dp[i-1][j], dp[i][j-1]), as s1[i] != s2[j]](/assets/bc5cade71b70677e.webp)
![i:1, j:4 => dp[i][j] = 1 + dp[i-1][j-1], as s1[i] == s2[j]](/assets/69c43968763f5659.webp)
![i:1, j:5 => dp[i][j] = max(dp[i-1][j], dp[i][j-1]), as s1[i] != s2[j]](/assets/0d9a9e7504927664.webp)
![i:2, j:2=> dp[i][j] = 1 + dp[i-1][j-1], as s1[i] == s2[j]](/assets/939915e70b00d5fb.webp)
![i:2, j:3-5 => dp[i][j] = max(dp[i-1][j], dp[i][j-1]), as s1[i] != s2[j]](/assets/e08d9467d08787e8.webp)
![i:3, j:3=> dp[i][j] = 1 + dp[i-1][j-1], as s1[i] == s2[j]](/assets/60e07cf18e39f30d.webp)
![i:4, j:5=> dp[i][j] = 1 + dp[i-1][j-1], as s1[i] == s2[j]](/assets/65b1ae715fd33fa0.webp)
![i:4, j:5=> dp[i][j] = 1 + dp[i-1][j-1], as s1[i] == s2[j]](/assets/35274555e210f767.webp)
From the above visualization, we can clearly see that the longest common subsequence is of length '3' -- as shown by dp[4][5].
Here is the code for our bottom-up dynamic programming approach:
class Solution {
public int findLCSLength(String s1, String s2) {
int[][] dp = new int[s1.length() + 1][s2.length() + 1];
int maxLength = 0;
for (int i = 1; i <= s1.length(); i++) {
for (int j = 1; j <= s2.length(); j++) {
if (s1.charAt(i - 1) == s2.charAt(j - 1)) dp[i][j] =
1 + dp[i - 1][j - 1];
else dp[i][j] = Math.max(dp[i - 1][j], dp[i][j - 1]);
maxLength = Math.max(maxLength, dp[i][j]);
}
}
return maxLength;
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
Solution lcs = new Solution();
System.out.println(lcs.findLCSLength("abdca", "cbda"));
System.out.println(lcs.findLCSLength("passport", "ppsspt"));
}
}
The time and space complexity of the above algorithm is
Challenge
Can we further improve our bottom-up DP solution? Can you find an algorithm that has
Hint
We only need one previous row to find the optimal solution!
class Solution {
static int findLCSLength(String s1, String s2) {
int[][] dp = new int[2][s2.length() + 1];
int maxLength = 0;
for (int i = 1; i <= s1.length(); i++) {
for (int j = 1; j <= s2.length(); j++) {
if (s1.charAt(i - 1) == s2.charAt(j - 1)) dp[i % 2][j] =
1 + dp[(i - 1) % 2][j - 1];
else dp[i % 2][j] = Math.max(dp[(i - 1) % 2][j], dp[i % 2][j - 1]);
maxLength = Math.max(maxLength, dp[i % 2][j]);
}
}
return maxLength;
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
Solution lcs = new Solution();
System.out.println(lcs.findLCSLength("abdca", "cbda"));
System.out.println(lcs.findLCSLength("passport", "ppsspt"));
}
}
🤖 Don't fully get this? Learn it with Claude
Stuck on Solution Longest Common Subsequence? Open Claude, copy a block below, and it'll teach you this exact concept — visually and interactively.
Progressively stronger hints — you still solve it.
I'm working on the problem **Solution Longest Common Subsequence** (DSA). Give me a HINT LADDER: start with the tiniest nudge, then wait. Only reveal the next, stronger hint when I ask. Do NOT show the full solution unless I type 'show solution'. Keep me doing the thinking. If you're unsure or a claim isn't standard, say so and reason from first principles instead of guessing.
See the technique, not just code.
Explain the optimal approach to **Solution Longest Common Subsequence** with a VISUAL walkthrough: trace it on a small concrete example using ASCII art / a step-by-step diagram, narrate what changes each step, then give time & space complexity with a one-line derivation. If you're unsure or a claim isn't standard, say so and reason from first principles instead of guessing.
Catch bugs, edge cases, sub-optimality.
I'll paste my solution to **Solution Longest Common Subsequence**. Review it for correctness, missed edge cases, and time/space complexity, then coach me toward the optimal — don't just rewrite it. Ask me to paste my code now. If you're unsure or a claim isn't standard, say so and reason from first principles instead of guessing.
Lock in recognition with look-alikes.
Give me 2 problems that use the SAME underlying pattern as **Solution Longest Common Subsequence**. For each, let me attempt first, then review my answer and name the trigger signal that reveals the pattern. If you're unsure or a claim isn't standard, say so and reason from first principles instead of guessing.