Solution Longest Bitonic Subsequence
Problem Statement
Given a number sequence, find the length of its Longest Bitonic Subsequence (LBS). A subsequence is considered bitonic if it is monotonically increasing and then monotonically decreasing.
Example 1:
Input: {4,2,3,6,10,1,12}
Output: 5
Explanation: The LBS is {2,3,6,10,1}.
Example 2:
Input: {4,2,5,9,7,6,10,3,1}
Output: 7
Explanation: The LBS is {4,5,9,7,6,3,1}.
Basic Solution
A basic brute-force solution could be to try finding the Longest Decreasing Subsequences (LDS), starting from every number in both directions. So for every index 'i' in the given array, we will do two things:
- Find LDS starting from 'i' to the end of the array.
- Find LDS starting from 'i' to the beginning of the array.
LBS would be the maximum sum of the above two subsequences.
Code
Here is the code:
class Solution {
private int findLBSLength(int[] nums) {
int maxLength = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < nums.length; i++) {
int c1 = findLDSLength(nums, i, -1);
int c2 = findLDSLengthRev(nums, i, -1);
maxLength = Math.max(maxLength, c1 + c2 - 1);
}
return maxLength;
}
// find the longest decreasing subsequence from currentIndex till the end of the array
private int findLDSLength(int[] nums, int currentIndex, int previousIndex) {
if (currentIndex == nums.length) return 0;
// include nums[currentIndex] if it is smaller than the previous number
int c1 = 0;
if (previousIndex == -1 || nums[currentIndex] < nums[previousIndex]) c1 =
1 + findLDSLength(nums, currentIndex + 1, currentIndex);
// excluding the number at currentIndex
int c2 = findLDSLength(nums, currentIndex + 1, previousIndex);
return Math.max(c1, c2);
}
// find the longest decreasing subsequence from currentIndex till the beginning of the array
private int findLDSLengthRev(
int[] nums,
int currentIndex,
int previousIndex
) {
if (currentIndex < 0) return 0;
// include nums[currentIndex] if it is smaller than the previous number
int c1 = 0;
if (previousIndex == -1 || nums[currentIndex] < nums[previousIndex]) c1 =
1 + findLDSLengthRev(nums, currentIndex - 1, currentIndex);
// excluding the number at currentIndex
int c2 = findLDSLengthRev(nums, currentIndex - 1, previousIndex);
return Math.max(c1, c2);
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
Solution lbs = new Solution();
int[] nums = { 4, 2, 3, 6, 10, 1, 12 };
System.out.println(lbs.findLBSLength(nums));
nums = new int[] { 4, 2, 5, 9, 7, 6, 10, 3, 1 };
System.out.println(lbs.findLBSLength(nums));
}
}
The time complexity of the above algorithm is exponential
Top-down Dynamic Programming with Memoization
To overcome the overlapping subproblems, we can use an array to store the already solved subproblems.
We need to memoize the recursive functions that calculate the longest decreasing subsequence. The two changing values for our recursive function are the current and the previous index. Therefore, we can store the results of all subproblems in a two-dimensional array. (Another alternative could be to use a hash-table whose key would be a string (currentIndex + "|" + previousIndex)).
Code
Here is the code:
class Solution {
private int findLBSLength(int[] nums) {
Integer[][] lds = new Integer[nums.length][nums.length + 1];
Integer[][] ldsRev = new Integer[nums.length][nums.length + 1];
int maxLength = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < nums.length; i++) {
int c1 = findLDSLength(lds, nums, i, -1);
int c2 = findLDSLengthReverse(ldsRev, nums, i, -1);
maxLength = Math.max(maxLength, c1 + c2 - 1);
}
return maxLength;
}
// find the longest decreasing subsequence from currentIndex till the end of the array
private int findLDSLength(
Integer[][] dp,
int[] nums,
int currentIndex,
int previousIndex
) {
if (currentIndex == nums.length) return 0;
if (dp[currentIndex][previousIndex + 1] == null) {
// include nums[currentIndex] if it is smaller than the previous number
int c1 = 0;
if (previousIndex == -1 || nums[currentIndex] < nums[previousIndex]) c1 =
1 + findLDSLength(dp, nums, currentIndex + 1, currentIndex);
// excluding the number at currentIndex
int c2 = findLDSLength(dp, nums, currentIndex + 1, previousIndex);
dp[currentIndex][previousIndex + 1] = Math.max(c1, c2);
}
return dp[currentIndex][previousIndex + 1];
}
// find the longest decreasing subsequence from currentIndex till the beginning of the array
private int findLDSLengthReverse(
Integer[][] dp,
int[] nums,
int currentIndex,
int previousIndex
) {
if (currentIndex < 0) return 0;
if (dp[currentIndex][previousIndex + 1] == null) {
// include nums[currentIndex] if it is smaller than the previous number
int c1 = 0;
if (previousIndex == -1 || nums[currentIndex] < nums[previousIndex]) c1 =
1 + findLDSLengthReverse(dp, nums, currentIndex - 1, currentIndex);
// excluding the number at currentIndex
int c2 = findLDSLengthReverse(dp, nums, currentIndex - 1, previousIndex);
dp[currentIndex][previousIndex + 1] = Math.max(c1, c2);
}
return dp[currentIndex][previousIndex + 1];
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
Solution lbs = new Solution();
int[] nums = { 4, 2, 3, 6, 10, 1, 12 };
System.out.println(lbs.findLBSLength(nums));
nums = new int[] { 4, 2, 5, 9, 7, 6, 10, 3, 1 };
System.out.println(lbs.findLBSLength(nums));
}
}
Bottom-up Dynamic Programming
The above algorithm shows us a clear bottom-up approach. We can separately calculate LDS for every index i.e., from the beginning to the end of the array and vice versa. The required length of LBS would be the one that has the maximum sum of LDS for a given index (from both ends).
Code
Here is the code for our bottom-up dynamic programming approach:
class Solution {
private int findLBSLength(int[] nums) {
int[] lds = new int[nums.length];
int[] ldsReverse = new int[nums.length];
// find LDS for every index up to the beginning of the array
for (int i = 0; i < nums.length; i++) {
lds[i] = 1; // every element is an LDS of length 1
for (int j = i - 1; j >= 0; j--) if (nums[j] < nums[i]) {
lds[i] = Math.max(lds[i], lds[j] + 1);
}
}
// find LDS for every index up to the end of the array
for (int i = nums.length - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
ldsReverse[i] = 1; // every element is an LDS of length 1
for (int j = i + 1; j < nums.length; j++) if (nums[j] < nums[i]) {
ldsReverse[i] = Math.max(ldsReverse[i], ldsReverse[j] + 1);
}
}
int maxLength = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < nums.length; i++) {
maxLength = Math.max(maxLength, lds[i] + ldsReverse[i] - 1);
}
return maxLength;
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
Solution lbs = new Solution();
int[] nums = { 4, 2, 3, 6, 10, 1, 12 };
System.out.println(lbs.findLBSLength(nums));
nums = new int[] { 4, 2, 5, 9, 7, 6, 10, 3, 1 };
System.out.println(lbs.findLBSLength(nums));
}
}
The time complexity of the above algorithm is
🤖 Don't fully get this? Learn it with Claude
Stuck on Solution Longest Bitonic Subsequence? Open Claude, copy a block below, and it'll teach you this exact concept — visually and interactively.
Progressively stronger hints — you still solve it.
I'm working on the problem **Solution Longest Bitonic Subsequence** (DSA). Give me a HINT LADDER: start with the tiniest nudge, then wait. Only reveal the next, stronger hint when I ask. Do NOT show the full solution unless I type 'show solution'. Keep me doing the thinking. If you're unsure or a claim isn't standard, say so and reason from first principles instead of guessing.
See the technique, not just code.
Explain the optimal approach to **Solution Longest Bitonic Subsequence** with a VISUAL walkthrough: trace it on a small concrete example using ASCII art / a step-by-step diagram, narrate what changes each step, then give time & space complexity with a one-line derivation. If you're unsure or a claim isn't standard, say so and reason from first principles instead of guessing.
Catch bugs, edge cases, sub-optimality.
I'll paste my solution to **Solution Longest Bitonic Subsequence**. Review it for correctness, missed edge cases, and time/space complexity, then coach me toward the optimal — don't just rewrite it. Ask me to paste my code now. If you're unsure or a claim isn't standard, say so and reason from first principles instead of guessing.
Lock in recognition with look-alikes.
Give me 2 problems that use the SAME underlying pattern as **Solution Longest Bitonic Subsequence**. For each, let me attempt first, then review my answer and name the trigger signal that reveals the pattern. If you're unsure or a claim isn't standard, say so and reason from first principles instead of guessing.