Triangle Judgement
Problem
Table: Triangle
+-------------+------+
| Column Name | Type |
+-------------+------+
| x | int |
| y | int |
| z | int |
+-------------+------+
In SQL, (x, y, z) is the primary key column for this table.
Each row of this table contains the lengths of three line segments.
Report for every three line segments whether they can form a triangle.
Return the result table in any order.
Example
Output
Try it YourSelf
-- TODO: Write your user queries here
Solution
To assess the validity of triangles defined by sets of three values (x, y, z), the approach involves employing a SQL query on the 'Triangle' table. The query utilizes a CASE statement to evaluate the conditions of the triangle inequality theorem, determining whether the sum of any two sides is greater than the length of the third side. The result will be a clear classification of each set as either forming a valid ('Yes') or invalid ('No') triangle, providing a straightforward analysis of the geometric properties within the 'Triangle' dataset."
SELECT x, y, z, CASE WHEN x + y > z AND y + z > x AND x + z > y THEN 'Yes' ELSE 'No' end triangle FROM Triangle
Let's break down the SQL query step by step.
Step 1: SELECT Statement
This query selects columns x, y, and z from the triangle table and adds a new column named triangle. The CASE statement checks whether the given set of values (x, y, z) satisfies the conditions for forming a triangle.
Step 2: Evaluate the CASE statement
The conditions within the WHEN clause check whether the sum of any two sides is greater than the third side. The conditions are:
CASE WHEN x + y > z AND y + z > x AND x + z > y THEN 'Yes' ELSE 'No'
x + y > z: The sum of sidexand sideyis greater than sidez.y + z > x: The sum of sideyand sidezis greater than sidex.x + z > y: The sum of sidexand sidezis greater than sidey.
If all three conditions are true, then the CASE statement evaluates to 'Yes,' indicating that the given values can form a valid triangle.
If any of the conditions is false, the ELSE clause is triggered, and the CASE statement evaluates to 'No,' indicating that the values cannot form a valid triangle.
Final Output:
+----+----+----+----------+ | x | y | z | triangle | +----+----+----+----------+ | 13 | 15 | 30 | No | | 10 | 20 | 15 | Yes | +----+----+----+----------+
🤖 Don't fully get this? Learn it with Claude
Stuck on Triangle Judgement? Open Claude, copy a block below, and it'll teach you this exact concept — visually and interactively.
Build the mental picture, not memorization.
I just read a lesson on **Triangle Judgement** (Databases) and want to truly understand it. Explain Triangle Judgement from first principles using ONE vivid real-world analogy and a visual mental model — draw it as ASCII art or a clear step-by-step diagram — with a concrete example using real numbers. Then ask me one question to check I got the mental picture, and wait for my reply. If you're unsure or a claim isn't standard, say so and reason from first principles instead of guessing.
Socratic — adapts to where you're stuck.
Teach me **Triangle Judgement** interactively. Ask me ONE guiding question at a time, wait for my answer, and adapt to my confusion — build the idea with me step by step instead of explaining it all at once. If you're unsure or a claim isn't standard, say so and reason from first principles instead of guessing.
Active recall exposes what you missed.
Quiz me on **Triangle Judgement** with 5 questions, easy to tricky, ONE at a time. Tell me if each answer is right; at the end, explain clearly what I got wrong and why. If you're unsure or a claim isn't standard, say so and reason from first principles instead of guessing.
Intuition + hook + flashcards for long-term memory.
Help me remember **Triangle Judgement** for the long term: give the one-sentence intuition, a memorable hook/mnemonic, a tiny worked example, and 3 active-recall flashcards (Q -> A). If you're unsure or a claim isn't standard, say so and reason from first principles instead of guessing.