easy Rectangle Validation
Problem Statement
Table: Rectangle
This table stores the dimensions of rectangles. Each row contains the lengths of four sides of a rectangle.
+---------------+------+
| Column Name | Type |
+---------------+------+
| a | int |
| b | int |
| c | int |
| d | int |
+---------------+------+
(a, b, c, d) is the primary key for this table.
Each row of this table contains the lengths of four sides of a rectangle.
Determine for each set of four line segments whether they can form a rectangle. A set of line segments can form a rectangle if opposite sides are equal.
Return the result table in any order.
Example
Input:
Rectangle table: +----+----+----+----+ | a | b | c | d | +----+----+----+----+ | 15 | 10 | 15 | 10 | | 15 | 10 | 15 | 20 | +----+----+----+----+
Output:
+----+----+----+----+-----------+ | a | b | c | d | rectangle | +----+----+----+----+-----------+ | 15 | 10 | 15 | 10 | Yes | | 15 | 10 | 15 | 20 | No | +----+----+----+----+-----------+
In this example, the first set of sides (15, 10, 15, 10) can form a rectangle because the opposite sides are equal. The second set of sides (15, 10, 15, 20) cannot form a rectangle because not all opposite sides are equal.
Try It YourSelf
-- TODO: Write your user queries here
Solution
To solve this problem, we need to check each row in the Rectangle table to determine if the given sides can form a rectangle based on the condition that opposite sides must be equal.
- Check Opposite Sides: Verify if sides (a, c) and (b, d) are equal for each row.
- Return Result: Based on the equality of opposite sides, return 'Yes' if the sides can form a rectangle, otherwise return 'No'.
SQL Query
SELECT a, b, c, d, CASE WHEN a = c AND b = d THEN 'Yes' ELSE 'No' END as rectangle FROM Rectangle;
Step by Step Approach
Step 1: Check Opposite Sides
Check if opposite sides are equal for each row in the table.
SELECT a, b, c, d, (a = c AND b = d) as is_rectangle FROM Rectangle
Output After Step 1:
+----+----+----+----+--------------+ | a | b | c | d | is_rectangle | +----+----+----+----+--------------+ | 15 | 10 | 15 | 10 | 1 | | 15 | 10 | 15 | 20 | 0 | +----+----+----+----+--------------+
Step 2: Return Result
Based on the equality check, return 'Yes' if the sides can form a rectangle, otherwise return 'No'.
SELECT a, b, c, d, CASE WHEN a = c AND b = d THEN 'Yes' ELSE 'No' END as rectangle FROM Rectangle
Final Output:
+----+----+----+----+-----------+ | a | b | c | d | rectangle | +----+----+----+----+-----------+ | 15 | 10 | 15 | 10 | Yes | | 15 | 10 | 15 | 20 | No | +----+----+----+----+-----------+
🤖 Don't fully get this? Learn it with Claude
Stuck on Rectangle Validation? Open Claude, copy a block below, and it'll teach you this exact concept — visually and interactively.
Progressively stronger hints — you still solve it.
I'm working on the problem **Rectangle Validation** (Databases). Give me a HINT LADDER: start with the tiniest nudge, then wait. Only reveal the next, stronger hint when I ask. Do NOT show the full solution unless I type 'show solution'. Keep me doing the thinking. If you're unsure or a claim isn't standard, say so and reason from first principles instead of guessing.
See the technique, not just code.
Explain the optimal approach to **Rectangle Validation** with a VISUAL walkthrough: trace it on a small concrete example using ASCII art / a step-by-step diagram, narrate what changes each step, then give time & space complexity with a one-line derivation. If you're unsure or a claim isn't standard, say so and reason from first principles instead of guessing.
Catch bugs, edge cases, sub-optimality.
I'll paste my solution to **Rectangle Validation**. Review it for correctness, missed edge cases, and time/space complexity, then coach me toward the optimal — don't just rewrite it. Ask me to paste my code now. If you're unsure or a claim isn't standard, say so and reason from first principles instead of guessing.
Lock in recognition with look-alikes.
Give me 2 problems that use the SAME underlying pattern as **Rectangle Validation**. For each, let me attempt first, then review my answer and name the trigger signal that reveals the pattern. If you're unsure or a claim isn't standard, say so and reason from first principles instead of guessing.